<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tyson Robichaud Photo-blography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, reviews and general rambling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen.  The GX1, best bang for the buck? by terrydarc</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/my-how-the-mighty-prices-have-fallen-the-gx1-best-bang-for-the-buck/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terrydarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=3113#comment-3432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s hoping a pana with a viewfinder comes in for such a super markdown. As it is, that&#039;s a darn good price. Notice they didn&#039;t have a GH1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s hoping a pana with a viewfinder comes in for such a super markdown. As it is, that&#8217;s a darn good price. Notice they didn&#8217;t have a GH1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen.  The GX1, best bang for the buck? by mostdeadly3</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/my-how-the-mighty-prices-have-fallen-the-gx1-best-bang-for-the-buck/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mostdeadly3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=3113#comment-3431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely cool times to be a camera geek. I really enjoy how the quality of these sensors are increasing and the investment into the lenses as well. Its  its an (compared to dslr) affordable and fun option for me. The 14mm is definately my next lens. I really like primes!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely cool times to be a camera geek. I really enjoy how the quality of these sensors are increasing and the investment into the lenses as well. Its  its an (compared to dslr) affordable and fun option for me. The 14mm is definately my next lens. I really like primes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen.  The GX1, best bang for the buck? by tyson robichaud photography</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/my-how-the-mighty-prices-have-fallen-the-gx1-best-bang-for-the-buck/#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyson robichaud photography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=3113#comment-3429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Chris,

I too paid (double) for my G3 and had/have no regrets.  They are quality cams and are just an amazing amount of quality for the price of a lower end compact (granted these don&#039;t have a lens included, but hey, there are economical options for these as well).  Honestly, I actually like the form factor of the G3 better personally.  The tilt/swivel LCD is also something I miss greatly.  Really the bulk of the EVF is the only drawback with the GX1 measuring in smaller than the GF1 is/was, and with the 14mm or 20mm pancake is just tiny compared to the image quality they are capable of producing.  Really cool times to be a photo-geek.

t]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris,</p>
<p>I too paid (double) for my G3 and had/have no regrets.  They are quality cams and are just an amazing amount of quality for the price of a lower end compact (granted these don&#8217;t have a lens included, but hey, there are economical options for these as well).  Honestly, I actually like the form factor of the G3 better personally.  The tilt/swivel LCD is also something I miss greatly.  Really the bulk of the EVF is the only drawback with the GX1 measuring in smaller than the GF1 is/was, and with the 14mm or 20mm pancake is just tiny compared to the image quality they are capable of producing.  Really cool times to be a photo-geek.</p>
<p>t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen.  The GX1, best bang for the buck? by mostdeadly3</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/my-how-the-mighty-prices-have-fallen-the-gx1-best-bang-for-the-buck/#comment-3427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mostdeadly3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=3113#comment-3427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, ive been using the G3 for a while now and love it, paired with the 20mm and its a damn fine cam. It doesn&#039;t look as cool as the gx1 but i love having an evf. Great prices at the moment i paid a great deal more for mine but no regrets. Also, the metrado batteries which i believe can be used in both cameras are about £10 and extremely reliable. Been using 3 of them for last 2 years with the G3, no complaints!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, ive been using the G3 for a while now and love it, paired with the 20mm and its a damn fine cam. It doesn&#8217;t look as cool as the gx1 but i love having an evf. Great prices at the moment i paid a great deal more for mine but no regrets. Also, the metrado batteries which i believe can be used in both cameras are about £10 and extremely reliable. Been using 3 of them for last 2 years with the G3, no complaints!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *Lumix G3 vs the mighty might GF1, or why I chose to upgrade my MILC. by tyson robichaud photography</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/lumix-g3-vs-the-mighty-might-gf1-or-why-i-chose-to-upgrade-my-milc/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyson robichaud photography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=1772#comment-3426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin,

Personally, I don&#039;t feel the G5 is twice the camera that the G3 is (or even bordering on close to that).  It has the rocker switch to engage the zoom function for the power zoom lenses which could be cool (I don&#039;t own or use any of the PZ lenses), but it has the same sensor, I believe one generation newer in the processor, and the specs otherwise are pretty similar.  I&#039;d imagine the touch screen is a little more responsive and of course the body is shaped with a larger grip which could be both great for handling, but also adds bulk.  If you can, get both in your hands, but for me, at the current prices, I&#039;d go G3 all day, and then again tomorrow :)  Not sure what the current deals are in the UK, but right now, both the GX1 and G3 are $250, so, if that stands over there, you could feasibly get both those cameras for about the same price as the G5...  Just a thought ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t feel the G5 is twice the camera that the G3 is (or even bordering on close to that).  It has the rocker switch to engage the zoom function for the power zoom lenses which could be cool (I don&#8217;t own or use any of the PZ lenses), but it has the same sensor, I believe one generation newer in the processor, and the specs otherwise are pretty similar.  I&#8217;d imagine the touch screen is a little more responsive and of course the body is shaped with a larger grip which could be both great for handling, but also adds bulk.  If you can, get both in your hands, but for me, at the current prices, I&#8217;d go G3 all day, and then again tomorrow <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Not sure what the current deals are in the UK, but right now, both the GX1 and G3 are $250, so, if that stands over there, you could feasibly get both those cameras for about the same price as the G5&#8230;  Just a thought <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen.  The GX1, best bang for the buck? by tyson robichaud photography</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/my-how-the-mighty-prices-have-fallen-the-gx1-best-bang-for-the-buck/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyson robichaud photography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=3113#comment-3425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Tara!

I hope to acquire a GH3 sometime in the future as I think it provides, far and away, the most functional body for the system and can really see it as the first body that I could supplant my DSLR&#039;s with as far as work is concerned.  You&#039;re right though, for the money, it&#039;s a steal for the GX1 (or the G3 IMO!)

Cheers,

Tyson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tara!</p>
<p>I hope to acquire a GH3 sometime in the future as I think it provides, far and away, the most functional body for the system and can really see it as the first body that I could supplant my DSLR&#8217;s with as far as work is concerned.  You&#8217;re right though, for the money, it&#8217;s a steal for the GX1 (or the G3 IMO!)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tyson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *Lumix G3 vs the mighty might GF1, or why I chose to upgrade my MILC. by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/lumix-g3-vs-the-mighty-might-gf1-or-why-i-chose-to-upgrade-my-milc/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=1772#comment-3424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tyson, many thanks for speedy and thoughtful reply! May I be cheeky and ask a follow-up? I&#039;ve just noticed the G5 which is +£200 over the G3. Money well spent? K]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tyson, many thanks for speedy and thoughtful reply! May I be cheeky and ask a follow-up? I&#8217;ve just noticed the G5 which is +£200 over the G3. Money well spent? K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen.  The GX1, best bang for the buck? by Tara Tanaka</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/my-how-the-mighty-prices-have-fallen-the-gx1-best-bang-for-the-buck/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tara Tanaka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=3113#comment-3423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post.  I&#039;m now using the GH3 as my main camera, but find that the viewfinder of the GX1 is much superior, and the IQ seems the same to me, if you don&#039;t count the much improved ISO handling of the GH3.  For nature photography I really like the 6fps for 24 frames in RAW of the GH3 vs. 3.5 fps for 10 frames with the GX1.  The GX1 really eats batteries, but if you are using flash or usually have plenty of light and don&#039;t need better higher-ISO handling, it&#039;s quite a steal!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I&#8217;m now using the GH3 as my main camera, but find that the viewfinder of the GX1 is much superior, and the IQ seems the same to me, if you don&#8217;t count the much improved ISO handling of the GH3.  For nature photography I really like the 6fps for 24 frames in RAW of the GH3 vs. 3.5 fps for 10 frames with the GX1.  The GX1 really eats batteries, but if you are using flash or usually have plenty of light and don&#8217;t need better higher-ISO handling, it&#8217;s quite a steal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *Lumix G3 vs the mighty might GF1, or why I chose to upgrade my MILC. by *My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen. The GX1, best bang for the buck? &#124; Tyson Robichaud Photo-blography</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/lumix-g3-vs-the-mighty-might-gf1-or-why-i-chose-to-upgrade-my-milc/#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[*My, how the mighty (prices) have fallen. The GX1, best bang for the buck? &#124; Tyson Robichaud Photo-blography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=1772#comment-3422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] from the G3, you can see my comparison between the older 12mp sensor and this newer 16mp sensor HERE.  While I feel that the newer Sony built sensor in the newer Oly&#8217;s has a slight edge over [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from the G3, you can see my comparison between the older 12mp sensor and this newer 16mp sensor HERE.  While I feel that the newer Sony built sensor in the newer Oly&#8217;s has a slight edge over [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on *Lumix G3 vs the mighty might GF1, or why I chose to upgrade my MILC. by tyson robichaud photography</title>
		<link>http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/2012/01/07/lumix-g3-vs-the-mighty-might-gf1-or-why-i-chose-to-upgrade-my-milc/#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyson robichaud photography]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tysonrobichaudphotography.wordpress.com/?p=1772#comment-3418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin,

I think the upgrade would not only be a noticeable one quality wise as the newer sensor made a couple big steps forward, but the fact that you can pretty much make a straight swap would be a no brainer if you liked the idea of the G3.  If I were you, I&#039;d try to hold onto the 14mm pancake.  I know it may seem a little redundant with the 14-42pz, but it is one of the best examples of what the system is capable of regarding size and weight reduction, quality optics and even on the G3, makes for a just about pocketable combo.  If it is the only way to sell off the GF2, and you feel it is the weak link in your lens lineup, go for it, but I&#039;m a fan of trying to hold onto optics, or at least optics I like.  They hold their value far longer than cameras do, and in that way are a better &quot;investment&quot; as it were.

I won&#039;t spend your money for you, but GO FOR IT!  I can&#039;t see a scenario where you&#039;d be giving anything up other than a slight decrease in pocketability all while gaining the tilt swivel screen, newer sensor, far better EVF, etc...

Cheers and enjoy!

t]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>I think the upgrade would not only be a noticeable one quality wise as the newer sensor made a couple big steps forward, but the fact that you can pretty much make a straight swap would be a no brainer if you liked the idea of the G3.  If I were you, I&#8217;d try to hold onto the 14mm pancake.  I know it may seem a little redundant with the 14-42pz, but it is one of the best examples of what the system is capable of regarding size and weight reduction, quality optics and even on the G3, makes for a just about pocketable combo.  If it is the only way to sell off the GF2, and you feel it is the weak link in your lens lineup, go for it, but I&#8217;m a fan of trying to hold onto optics, or at least optics I like.  They hold their value far longer than cameras do, and in that way are a better &#8220;investment&#8221; as it were.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t spend your money for you, but GO FOR IT!  I can&#8217;t see a scenario where you&#8217;d be giving anything up other than a slight decrease in pocketability all while gaining the tilt swivel screen, newer sensor, far better EVF, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers and enjoy!</p>
<p>t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
